In-Situ Event Localization for Pipeline Monitoring System Based Wireless Sensor Network Using K-Nearest Neighbors and Support Vector Machine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29304/jqcm.2020.12.3.705Keywords:
WSN, In-Situ, Pipeline Monitoring, Localization, PCA, SVM and KNN, ClassificationAbstract
Pipeline Monitoring Systems (PMS) benefits the most of recent developments in wireless remote monitoring since each pipeline would span for long distances which make conventional methods unsuitable. Precise monitoring and detection of damaging events requires moving large amounts of data between sensor nodes and base station for processing which require high bandwidth communication protocol. To overcome this problem, In-Situ processing can be practiced by processing the collected data locally at each node instead of the base station. However, this introduce a challenge to the limited resources available on the nodes. In this paper, a Wireless Sensor Network (WSN) was implemented for In-Situ Pipeline Monitoring System with proposed algorithms for event location estimation. The proposed algorithms include feature extraction (using ANOVA), dimensionality reduction using statistical procedure that is (Principle Component Analysis PCA) and data classification using supervised learning K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The proposed system was tested on pipelines in Al-Mussaib Gas Turbine Power Plant. During test, knocking events are applied at several distances relative to the nodes locations. Data collected at each node is filtered and processed locally in real time in each two adjacent nodes. The results of the estimation is then sent to the supervisor at base-station for display. The results show the proposed system ability to estimate the location of knocking event.
Downloads
References
2. Zajam, S., T. Joshi, and B. Bhattacharya, Application of wavelet analysis and machine learning on vibration data from gas pipelines for structural health monitoring. Procedia Structural Integrity, 2019. 14: p. 712-719.
3. Journal, P.a.G., https://pgjonline.com/magazine/2018/September-2018-vol-245-no-9/features/leak-detection-going-to-the-dogs last accessed 28 November, 2019.
4. Obeid, A.M., et al., Towards realisation of wireless sensor network-based water pipeline monitoring systems: a comprehensive review of techniques and platforms. IET science, measurement & technology, 2016. 10(5): p. 420-426.
5. Hossain, N.I., S. Reza, and M. Ali. VibNet: Application of Wireless Sensor Network for Vibration Monitoring Using ARM. in 2019 International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST). 2019. IEEE.
6. Nageswari, S. and T. Saravanan, Intelligent Garbage Monitoring Method Using LAN Server and Raspberry PI. framework. 14(15): p. 16.
7. Kumar, D.P., T. Amgoth, and C.S.R. Annavarapu, Machine learning algorithms for wireless sensor networks: A survey. Information Fusion, 2019. 49: p. 1-25.
8. Paudyal, S., M.S.A. Atique, and C.X. Yang. Local Maximum Acceleration Based Rotating Machinery Fault Classification Using KNN. in 2019 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT). 2019. IEEE.
9. Raktrakulthum, P.-a. and C. Netramai. Vehicle classification in congested traffic based on 3D point cloud using SVM and KNN. in 2017 9th International Conference on Information Technology and Electrical Engineering (ICITEE). 2017. IEEE.
10. Mossa, N.F., W.F. Shareef, and F.F. Shareef, Design of Oil Pipeline Monitoring System based on Wireless Sensor Network. IRAQI JOURNAL OF COMPUTERS, COMMUNICATION AND CONTROL & SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2018. 18(2): p. 53-62.
11. Harris, C.M. and A.G. Piersol, Harris' shock and vibration handbook. Vol. 5. 2002: McGraw-Hill New York.
12. Hawi, R., Wireless Sensor Networks--Sensor Node Architecture and Design Challenges. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science, 2014. 5(1).
13. https://ww2.mathworks.cn/help/stats/classification-learner-app.html?searchHighlight=app%20learner&s_tid=doc_srchtitle. 28-11-2019.
14. Chen, D., et al., Selecting genes by test statistics. BioMed Research International, 2005. 2005(2): p. 132-138.
15. Verma, C.V. and S. Ghosh. Dimensionality Reduction Using PCA Algorithm for Improving Accuracy in Prediction of Cardiac Ailments in Diabetic Patients. in Proceedings of International Conference on Wireless Communication. 2020. Springer.
16. Dubitzky, W., M. Granzow, and D.P. Berrar, Fundamentals of data mining in genomics and proteomics. 2007: Springer Science & Business Media.
17. Wan, J., et al., Hierarchical leak detection and localization method in natural gas pipeline monitoring sensor networks. Sensors, 2012. 12(1): p. 189-214.
18. J Cui, Y.W.-M.a.M.S., 2010 - degruyter.com, Novel Approach of Analog Fault Classification Using a Support Vector Machines Classifier. 2010.
19. http://abhijitannaldas.com/ml/kmeans-vs-knn-in-machine-learning.html. 2017 6/12/2019.
20. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11568897/value-of-k-in-k-nearest-neighbor-algorithm. 2019 6/12/2019.
21. Han, J., J. Pei, and M. Kamber, Data mining: concepts and techniques. 2011: Elsevier.
