Energy and Mobility-based Routing Protocol for E-VANET

Authors

  • Ahmed Jawad Kadhim Ministry of Education, General Directorate for Education in Al-Qadisiyah, Al-Qadisiyah, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29304/jqcsm.2026.18.32923

Keywords:

E-VANET, Electric Vehicles, Routing Protocol, Energy, Mobility

Abstract

Electrical Vehicular Ad Hoc Network (E-VANET) is the future version of vehicular networks, which comprises a large number of moving and parked electric vehicles connecting in a vast geographic area. It aims to exchange real-time information about weather, roads, accidents, traffic congestion, and other relevant details. The main issues that reduce the efficiency of routing in E-VANET are dynamicity due to the vehicle mobility and limitations of the vehicle's battery, which must be recharged frequently. In E-VANET, the vehicle's residual energy and energy consumption during route discovery and data forwarding affect the lifetime of electric vehicles and selected routes. Moreover, vehicle mobility affects the stability and lifetime of the selected route, and as a result, increases energy consumption during frequent route reconfiguration processes. Therefore, the data routing operations in E-VANET require a special routing protocol that takes into account vehicle mobility, energy consumption, and battery limitations. Thus, a new routing protocol based on energy and mobility for E-VANET called REME is proposed in this paper. It depends on formulating the routing problem as an optimization mathematical model, which is focused on the mobility and energy factors in constructing the optimal routes. In this model, the mobility factors represent the average velocity and direction of each pair of connected vehicles. Moreover, the energy factors refer to the vehicle's residual energy and the total energy required to send data from the source to the destination. REME assigns each pair of connected vehicles with residual energy exceeding their thresholds and moves them at the minimum average velocity in the same direction, thereby maximizing the chance for them to function as intermediate nodes in the constructed route. From various simulation scenarios, we concluded that REME is superior to AH-SFLA and SANCV according to average route stability, energy consumption, network overhead, and number of dead electric vehicles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

K. Mahmud, G. E. Town, S. Morsalin, & M. J. Hossain (2018, February). Integration of electric vehicles and management in the internet of energy. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82(3), (pp. 4179–4203).

J. I. Naser & A. J. Kadhim (2024, September). A Pareto optimization-based multipath routing protocol for E-VANET. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering & System, 17(6), (pp. 506–518).

A. J. Kadhim & J. I. Naser (2021, March). Toward electrical vehicular ad hoc networks: E-VANET. Journal of Electrical Engineering & Technology, 16, (pp. 1667–1683).

C. Lv, Y. Liu, X. Hu, H. Guo, D. Cao, & F. Wang (2018, August). Simultaneous observation of hybrid states for cyber-physical systems: a case study of electric vehicle powertrain. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 48(8), (pp. 2357–2367).

Y. Feng, Y. Huang, B. Li, H. Peng, J. Wang, & W. Zhou (2023, January). Connectivity enhancement of E-VANET based on QL-mRSU self-learning energy-saving algorithm. IEEE Access, 11, (pp. 3810–3825).

P. Liu, X. Wang, A. Hawbani, B. Hua, L. Zhao, & Z. Liu (2022, December). BETA: beacon-based traffic-aware routing in vehicular ad hoc networks. IEEE Transaction on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 23(12), (pp. 24206–24219).

A. J. Kadhim & S. A. H. Seno (2018, March). Energy-efficient multicast routing protocol based on SDN and fog computing for vehicular networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 84, (pp. 68–81).

A. J. K. Alshaibany (2025, January). An energy resource management for cluster based IoHV supported by fog computing. Karbala International Journal of Modern Science, 11, (pp. 35–55).

M. A. Karabulut, A. F. M. S. Shah, & H. Ilhhan (2020, May). OEC-MAC: A novel OFDMA based efficient cooperative MAC protocol for VANETS. IEEE Access, 8, (pp. 2169–3536).

S. K. Bhoi, P. K. Sahu, M. Singh, P. M. Khilar, R. R. Sahoo, & R. R. Swain (2019, June). Local traffic aware unicast routing scheme for connected car system. IEEE Transaction on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 21(6), (pp. 2360–2375).

J. Wu, M. Fang, H. Li, & X. Li (2020, January). RSU-assisted traffic-aware routing based on reinforcement learning for urban Vanets. IEEE Access, 8, (pp. 5733–5748).

R. Sadakale, N. V. K. Ramesh, & R. Patil (2020, July). TAD-HOC routing protocol for efficient VANET and infrastructure-oriented communication network. Journal of Engineering, 2020, (pp. 1–12).

J. Nadarajan & J. Kaliyaperuma (2021, February). QoS aware and secured routing algorithm using machine intelligence in next generation VANET. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 2021, (pp. 1–14).

R. Ramamoorthy & M. Thangavelu (2021, April). An enhanced hybrid ant colony optimization routing protocol for vehicular ad hoc networks. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 13, (pp. 3837–3868).

A. J. K. Al-Shaibany (2021, March). Stability-delay efficient cluster-based routing protocol for VANET. Karbala International Journal of Modern Science, 7(3), (pp. 187–205).

O. Alzamzami & I. Mahgoub (2021, March). Geographic routing enhancement for urban VANETs using link dynamic behavior: a cross layer approach. Vehicular Communications, 31, (pp. 1–14).

M. A. Shah, F. Z. Khan, G. Abbas, Z. H. Abbas, J. Ali, S. S. Aljameel, I. U. Khan, & N. Aslam (2022, September). Optimal path routing protocol for warning messages dissemination for highway VANET. Sensors, 22(18), (pp. 1–12).

R. K. Mahesh, S. S. Jawaligi, & V. Patil (2022, November). SFTD: A smart forwarding technique based reliable data dissemination scheme for VANETs. Measurement: Sensors, 24, (pp. 66–79).

M. Sindhwani, S. Sachdeva, A. Gupta, S. Tanwar, F. Alqahtani, A. Tolba, & M. S. Raboaca (2023, January). A novel context-aware reliable routing protocol and SVM implementation in vehicular area network. Mathematics, 11, (pp. 1–15).

A. Naeem, M. Rizwan, S. Alsubai, A. Almadhor, M. Akhtaruzzaman, S. Islam, & H. Rahman (2023, January). Enhanced clustering based routing protocol in vehicular ad‐hoc networks. IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, 11(7), (pp. 116–129).

B. Mehdi, S. Moussaoui, & G. Mohamed (2023, May). A geographic routing based on local traffic density and multi-hop

intersections in VANETs for intelligent traffic system in smart cities (GRBLTD-MI). Wireless Networks, 31, (pp. 23–37).

L. Rui, Z. Yan, Z. Tan, Z. Gao, Y. Yang, X. Chen, & H. Liu (2023, September). An intersection-based QoS routing for vehicular ad hoc networks with reinforcement learning. IEEE Transaction on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(9), (pp. 9068–9083).

S. Ullah, G. Abbas, M. Waqas, Z. H. Abbas, & A. Khan (2023, December). RSU assisted reliable relay selection for emergency message routing in intermittently connected VANETs. Wireless Networks, 29, (pp. 1311–1332).

R. Ramamoorthy (2024, January). An enhanced location aided ant colony routing for secure communication in vehicular ad hoc networks. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems, 4, (pp. 25–52).

A. K. Kazi, M. U. Farooq, R. Asif, & S. Hina (2025, October). Adaptive context-aware VANET routing protocol for intelligent transportation systems. Network, 5(4), (pp. 146-161).

R. Muthaiyan, S. Senthilkumar, C. V. Joe, & M. Kavitha (2025, May). Reliability based multi‑objective optimized routing protocol for VANETs using pelican optimization algorithm. Discover Applied Sciences, 7(22), (pp. 414-427).

Y. Tang, N. Cheng, W. Wu, M. Wang, Y. Dai, & X. Shen (2019, April). Delay-minimization routing for heterogeneous VANETs with machine learning based mobility prediction. IEEE Transaction on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 68(1), (pp. 3967–3979).

K. L. K. Sudheera, M. Ma, & P. H. J. Chong (2019, April). Connectivity aware tribrid routing framework for a generalized software defined vehicular network. Computer Networks, 7, (pp. 167–177).

K. Eirini & B. Torsten (2020, November). On the impact of SDN for transmission adaptation and FIB in NDN-VANETS. 18th ACM International Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access (MobiWac’20), (pp. 57–66). ACM.

D. Xinxin, H. Xiaohui, & Z. Jianan (2022, August). A QoS routing algorithm based on software-defined vehicular ad-hoc network. Computer Engineering, 48(11), (pp. 184–191).

H. Zhu, J. Liu, L. Jin, & G. Zhang (2023, May). Intersection-based unicast routing using ant colony optimization in software-defined vehicular networks. Electronics, 12(7), (pp. 1–15).

P. Sehrawat & M. Chawla (2023, June). SDTMRP (software defend traffic management routing protocol) for efficient and reliable communication in vehicular networks. Wireless Personal Communications, 131, (pp. 1595–1629).

Z. H. Ali, N. El-Rashidy, M. A. Elhosseini, & S. M. Ayyad (2024, October). SDN-based reliable emergency message routing schema using digital twins for adjusting beacon transmission in VANET. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 230, (pp. 302-313).

S. Ahmed, N. V. K. Ramesh, & B. N. K. Reddy (2025, January). An efficient routing mechanism for VANETs in SDN with hybrid meta-heuristic algorithm. Telecommunication Systems, 88(13), (pp. 148-164).

S. J. Rajan, S. Narayanaswamy, T. Balashanmugam, K. Sengottaiyan, & A. Selvaraj (2025, September). Efficient traffic management with adaptive SDN in vehicular networks. Scientific Reports, 15, (pp. 233-247).

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Ahmed Jawad Kadhim. (2026). Energy and Mobility-based Routing Protocol for E-VANET. Journal of Al-Qadisiyah for Computer Science and Mathematics, 18(3), Comp 449–465. https://doi.org/10.29304/jqcsm.2026.18.32923

Issue

Section

Computer Articles