Rule-Based Snapshot Verification and Recovery Framework for Distributed Cloud Storage

Authors

  • Ghassan Adnan Ghassan Adnan Hammoodi Al-Bdairi College of Information Technology, Information Networks Department, University of Babylon, Hilla, Iraq
  • Saad Talib Hasson College of Information Technology, Information Networks Department, University of Babylon, Hilla, Iraq

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29304/jqcsm.2026.18.33004

Keywords:

Cloud storage; Cloud-of-cloud; s, Data integrity; Snapshot verification;, Data recovery; File synconization;, fault tolerance

Abstract

Rapid proliferation of cloud storage services has enlarged the issue of protecting user data from  unauthorized modifications, deletions, or constraints by the provider in any distributed system. The current state-of-the-art Cloud-of-Clouds solutions improve both availability and integrity but do not provide an operator-controlled method to verify data across different cloud providers and restore a Metacloud to a previously trusted state after unauthorized modifications. In this paper, we present and implement an Intelligent Snapshot Verification and Recovery Framework (ISVRF) as a web service that integrates four commercial cloud storage providers operating under different legal jurisdictions. The proposed framework uses checksum-based snapshot verification, three synchronization modes (Primary Source, Merge, and Bi-Directional), and incorporates a freeze-and-rollback recovery mechanism. An evaluation of its efficacy is also provided through a snapshot performance workbench tested with different file sizes and varying numbers of providers. In 5 experiments (mean ± SD), the Primary Source strategy consistently achieved the lowest mean latency across all scenarios (e.g., 864.1 ± 60.8 ms for medium files with three providers). The maximum latency increase for the Merge and Bi-Directional strategies was 9.58%. Statistically significant differences between the fastest and second-fastest strategies were found in only 1 out of 9 scenarios (paired t-test, p = 0.0013). Increasing the providers from 3 to 5 resulted in a latency variation of not more than about 7%. These results show that resilient snapshot verification and recovery over diverse jurisdictions can be achieved with relatively modest and primarily transfer-bound overhead, making the framework suitable for periodic data protection in user and organizational contexts where the risk of data loss may be due to factors at the jurisdictional or provider level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Bdairi, Ghassan Adnan Hammoodi. "Metacloud as a tool of data storage reliability." Materials Today: Proceedings 60 (2022): 1844-1850

H. Abu-Libdeh, L. Princehouse, and H. Weatherspoon, “RACS: A case for cloud storage diversity,” in Proc. 1st ACM Symp. Cloud Computing (SoCC ’10), 2010, pp. 229–240.

A. Bessani, M. Correia, B. Quaresma, F. André, and P. Sousa, “DepSky: Dependable and secure storage in a cloud-of-clouds,” in Proc. EuroSys ’11, 2011, pp. 31–46; extended in ACM Trans. Storage, vol. 9, no. 4, art. 12, 2013.

K. D. Bowers, A. Juels, and A. Oprea, “HAIL: A high-availability and integrity layer for cloud storage,” in Proc. 16th ACM Conf. Computer and Communications Security (CCS ’09), 2009, pp. 187–198.

D. Dobre, P. Viotti, and M. Vukolić, “Hybris: Robust hybrid cloud storage,” ACM Trans. Storage, vol. 13, no. 3, 2017.

A. Bessani, R. Mendes, T. Oliveira, N. Neves, M. Correia, M. Pasin, and P. Verissimo, “SCFS: A shared cloud-backed file system,” in Proc. 2014 USENIX Annual Technical Conf. (USENIX ATC ’14), 2014, pp. 169–180.

P. Viotti and M. Vukolić, “Consistency in non-transactional distributed storage systems,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 49, no. 1, art. 19, 2016.

Allied Market Research, “Cloud Storage Market: Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2024–2033,” 2024.

A. Li, Y. Chen, Z. Yan, X. Zhou, and S. Shimizu, “A survey on integrity auditing for data storage in the cloud: from single copy to multiple replicas,” IEEE Transactions on Big Data, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 1428–1442, 2022.

H. Han, S. Fei, Z. Yan, and X. Zhou, “A survey on blockchain-based integrity auditing for cloud data,” Digital Communications and Networks, 2022.

E. N. Witanto, B. Stanley, and S.-G. Lee, “Distributed data integrity verification scheme in multi-cloud environment,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 3, art. 1623, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23031623.

“An efficient and secure protocol for checking remote data integrity in multi-cloud environment,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-93073-3.

S. Li, C. Xu, Y. Zhang, Y. Du, and K. Chen, “Blockchain-based transparent integrity auditing and encrypted deduplication for cloud storage,” IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 134–146, 2022.

M. Song, Z. Hua, Y. Zheng, H. Huang, and X. Jia, “Blockchain-based deduplication and integrity auditing over encrypted cloud storage,” IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing, 2023.

“Cloudlock: secure data sharing using a hybrid cryptosystem in multi-cloud data storage,” Cluster Computing, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10586-025-05433-7.

M. Bhavya, M. Prakash, J. Thriveni, and K. R. Venugopal, “Improving storage efficiency with multi-cluster deduplication and achieving high-data availability in cloud,” in Data Science and Computational Intelligence (ICInPro 2021), CCIS, vol. 1483, Springer, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-91244-4_7.

Nachiappan et al., “Optimized proactive recovery in erasure-coded cloud storage systems,” IEEE Access, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3267106.

“Security and privacy in multi-cloud and hybrid cloud environments: challenges, strategies, and future directions,” Computers & Security, 2025, doi/PII: S0167404825002883.

Yu, L., Zhang, X., Zhang, H., Sonchack, J., & Liu, V. (2024). Beaver: Practical partial snapshots for cloud microservices. In 18th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI 24) (pp. 771-787).

Nagaraju Unnava Journal: International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering (IJCESEN), Vol. 11, No. 4 (December 2025) Official doi: 10.22399/ijcesen.4537

Ahmad, A., Murase, K., & Hayashi, S. (2025). Intelligent snapshot of database for Dev/Test pipelines based on triggers. IEICE Technical Report, 125(SC2025-3), 11–16.

Santhosh S., et al., "Minimizing data recovery time in dynamic environments using greedy-prioritized snapshots," Journal of Cloud Computing and Storage, 2025. doi : 10.1016/j.jccs.2025.104218

Devan, P. (2025). Design and Evaluation of Ransomware-Proof Storage Systems Using Immutable Snapshots and AI Detection. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16408553

Wang, Y., et al. (2019). ChainFileSynch: An Innovate File Synchronization for Cloud Storage with Blockchain. International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIAM48774.2019.00115

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30

How to Cite

Ghassan Adnan Hammoodi Al-Bdairi , G. A., & Talib Hasson , S. (2026). Rule-Based Snapshot Verification and Recovery Framework for Distributed Cloud Storage. Journal of Al-Qadisiyah for Computer Science and Mathematics, 18(3), Comp 535–558. https://doi.org/10.29304/jqcsm.2026.18.33004

Issue

Section

Computer Articles